In reserving the category of “fashion” exclusively for certain kinds of white Western bourgeois styles of dress and personhood, the fashion elite have hijacked the term. Styles and practices of dress not sanctioned by the fashion elite are relegated to the broad category of “non-fashion,” which includes everything from outdated clothing styles to “ethnic garb.” In this binary logic, “fashion” is the sign of Western modernity, innovation, dynamism, and choice (a point Myers emphasizes so strongly) and non-fashion is the sign of the unmodern, the uninnovative, the static, and the oppressed. People associated with non-fashions like, say “ethnic garb,” are imagined as “traditional” subjects who lag behind or are situated outside of the modern West.Fraught Intimacies: Fashion & Feminism (The Director’s Cut) | threadbared (via violetthursdays)
(via garconniere)
-
femmeamie reblogged this from garconniere
-
mhals likes this
-
takenattheflood likes this
-
notstrangewingedsnail likes this
-
salome-rising reblogged this from garconniere
-
oftenangsty likes this
-
a-dna-lie likes this
-
imathers likes this
-
siberia likes this
-
hettie likes this
-
blackamazon likes this
-
exitclov likes this
-
bossyfemme reblogged this from garconniere
-
redheadbouquet likes this
-
oisel likes this
-
garconniere reblogged this from violetthursdays
-
apsides likes this
-
violetthursdays posted this